I saw a police training deal a while back and this instructor advised that:
"...to stop and
imbalance ALL knife attackers, the officer should chin jab/palm strike the attacker." He went on and on baout the chin jab...
I laughed because this instructor had forgotten:
- the sizes and strength of all male and female police officers
- the sizes and strength of all male and female knife attackers
- the shapes of human faces, heads and chin, (even "no-chin") shapes
- the propensity for many attackers to lower their heads in fights, ducking the chin
- the isometric power in many people's neck
- the cavalier, casual way in which chin jabs are often taught (just a bent hand, as
this officer shallowly showed) This can cause hyper-extension injuires
- the certain positioning between the two people, the certain height,
and the "center-line" if you will - to complete the common chin jab.
I always suggest eye attacks against knife wielders instead.
I suggest a claw-like, isometric-ish, hand position, strike as a chin jab, with its potential eye tap (as taught to me in the US Army many moons ago)
But when you think about all of this?
Never mind the knife attack scenario.
Should the ever-popular, chin jab be so...ever-popular?
A universal given? A universal solution as it is taught by many self-defense people?
I will ALWAYS teach it, but inside a bigger package.
But is it over-rated by many?
Hock
www.CombatCentric.com