Hock's Blog

Hock's Seminars

Hock's Shopsite

Hock's Web Page



Lauric Enterprises, Inc.
1314 W. McDermott
Ste 106-811
Allen, TX 75013
972-390-1777

New Links

Knife Book

Impact Weapons Book

First Contact

Critical Contact

Footwork Book

Facebook-CQC

Facebook-Hock

Hock's Author Pg

 

 


W. Hock Hochheim's

           Combat Centric

Talk Forum for Military, Police, Martial Artists and Aware Citizenry



Hock Hochheim's Combat Talk Forum

  • February 08, 2012, 10:02:44 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)  (Read 1621 times)

Hock

  • Administrator
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 7759
    • www.HocksCQC.com
Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« on: August 18, 2010, 09:55:29 AM »

Pretty interesting and challenging article from Black Belt Magazine, Feb. 2010.

Aikijujutsu vs. Aikido:
The Transition From Deadly Combat to Gentle Self-Defense
By Gail E. Nelson


Morihei Uyeshiba is credited with founding aikido in 1938. He first studied aikijujutsu but eliminated painful and dangerous techniques, as well as kicks and punches. A black belt and years of martial arts training do not guarantee survival on the streets. Some even say these skills may be absolutely useless in real-life combat situations.

Bernie Lau, a retired Seattle police detective and aikijujutsu instructor, founded the Washington Budokan after his 20 years of aikido training failed to support him in a life-threatening situation. Until the incident occurred, Lau found aikido to be helpful in his day-to-day police work. Aikido served him well even earlier on the evening of the incident, when he and his partner responded to two routine calls.

First, the pair entered a bar where a burly drunken man was smashing tables and chairs. With disciplined ease, Lau subdued the drunk and held him in an arm lock until a transportation unit arrived. Later, not far from the bar, a prostitute was fighting a man while trying to steal his wallet. Again, with quick motions, Lau subdued the prostitute and placed her under arrest. Lau used sankyo, a wrist-twist restraining lock taught in aikido.

Later that evening, however, Lau received a call that was to change the course of his aikido training forever. He and his partner were dispatched to a disturbance on the waterfront, where a 250-pound lumberjack, who was intoxicated and looking to fight, was provoking bar customers. When the officers arrived, the lumberjack challenged them to try and take him. With 20 years of aikido experience behind him, Lau met the challenge with strong confidence. He attempted several aikido techniques, but the moves barely fazed his opponent. The lumberjack was just too strong. During the melee, Lau’s partner was seriously injured by a kick to the face from the lumberjack. Backup units were called in, and after seeing Lau's injured partner, the officers overreacted and the lumberjack ended up in the hospital.

Baffled by this incident and his inability to subdue the lumberjack single-handedly, Lau became disillusioned and began questioning the methods of training in modern aikido. He believed he had let his partner down. Why was it that after years of training, he was unable to handle the lumberjack? His disillusion became an obsession: What was different in the arrest of the first drunk, the prostitute and the lumberjack?

The drunk, upon seeing the officers, cursed them but really didn't feel like fighting. A simple hold was all that was required to subdue him. The prostitute wanted to get away more than anything else, and taking her into custody was no problem. The lumberjack, however, was an entirely different situation. Besides being a skillful street fighter, he possessed the willingness to fight. This made him a very dangerous individual. Aikido techniques may not be enough for law-enforcement officials. A strong individual could escape from an aikido wrist-twist lock

Questions haunted Lau incessantly. How could the injury have been avoided? Why wasn’t the lumberjack subdued before the escalation occurred? Why did aikido fail?
Lau wrote his aikido instructor in Hawaii, asking for answers. The reply came swiftly by phone: “In street combat situations,” his instructor said, “you must use kicking and punching. Aikido alone will not work.”

Discussing the matter further, the aikido instructor recalled an altercation he had with a fellow sixth-degree black belt.

“What techniques did you use?” Lau asked.

“We didn’t use any techniques,” the instructor said. “We just punched it out!”

Completely disillusioned, Lau sought a workable solution. He conducted extensive research on aikido and its parent art, aikijujutsu.

Aikido
The main purpose of modern aikido is the development of a healthy mind and body. Aikido is not taught as a hand-to-hand combat method. The do (martial path) is stressed over the jutsu (martial art). Aikido is purely defensive in nature, and practice is not based on realistic street combat situations.

In 1912, at age 29, Morihei Uyeshiba, the founder of aikido, met Sokaku Takeda. Uyeshiba asked to be introduced to the secrets of daito-ryu aikijujutsu and was accepted as a disciple by Takeda. For the privilege of learning from Takeda, Uyeshiba had to pay between $150 and $300 per technique, plus chop wood and carry water for his instructor. Uyeshiba spent most of his inheritance during this period of training.

Most aikido locks (1) require the use of both hands and do not usually keep a violent suspect immobilized. But with the application of the joint-locking techniques (2) found in aikijujutsu, a suspect can be completely immobilized and the officer also has his other hand free.

Although his training in aikijujutsu lasted many years, Uyeshiba’s actual instruction under Takeda was only 100 days. He was very impressed by the secret techniques of daito-ryu and later received a transmission scroll that listed 188 general techniques, 30 aiki techniques and 36 secret teachings. Uyeshiba found the techniques of daito-ryu more practical than the jujutsu techniques he had previously learned. The nonviolent effectiveness of the joint-Iockng techniques and attacks to the vital points (atemi) were something new to him. Although Uyeshiba was physically stronger than Takeda, he was powerless to the latter’s control and pinning techniques.

In 1922, Uyeshiba was authorized by Takeda to become an instructor in daito-ryu aikijujutsu. Uyeshiba’s early form of aikijujutsu emphasized practical self-defense. As the years went by, however, he made gradual changes in the art. The transformation from aikijujutsu to aikido was a slow one, taking more than two decades. During that time, the art went by many names: daito-ryu aikijujutsu, tenshin-ryu aikijujutsu, Uyeshiba ryu, Takemuso aiki budo, aiki budo and finally aikido.

But bu (Japan’s military dimension) was dropped after World War II, probably because of the Allied occupation ban on practicing martial arts. The next big change was Uyeshiba’s decision to “go public” with his art. The techniques that could be practiced by the public (young and old, men and women) were quite different from those practiced by military students and senior black belts from Jigoro Kano’s Kodokan dojo (training hall). Painful and dangerous techniques were eliminated, as were strikes and kicks. Other techniques were modified for safety. Defensive measures replaced the aggressive nature of aikijujutsu.
 
Don Draeger said, “Uyeshiba's aikido is a highly weakened form of hand-to-hand combat. Aikido is essentially noncombative in nature. Further, the omission of atemi (strikes) from its techniques removes aikido from the category of practical hand-to-hand combat styles.” Uyeshiba thought aikido should not be used as a system of combat but rather as a path for self- and world improvements. “Aikido is not to defeat the enemy,” he said, “but to make no enemy.”

Another interesting fact Lau came across during his intensive research was that in 1953 in Hilo, Hawaii, Koichi Tohei, the first instructor from Japan to introduce aikido to the Western world, tried to convince the Hawaiian police to accept the art as their method of self-defense. Tohei’s aikido demonstrations were a success, but the mission died when the police turned him and aikido down. Modern aikido alone was not practical for police work.

Aikijujutsu
Unlike aikido, aikijujutsu is a warrior combat method used during Japan’s many civil wars. It was designed to cripple or kill the attacker or opponent.

Today, aikijujutsu techniques can be used to subdue a suspect or attacker without pain, to cause pain without injury, or to inflict pain, injury and the dislocation of joints, should the situation demand it. In aikijujutsu, ample use is made of striking techniques against body weaknesses. One also studies many martial disciplines in aikijujutsu and receives a well-rounded and effective program of combat skills. A path for personal improvement and awareness remains open, but the primary purpose of aikijujutsu is an effective form of combat.

In aikijujutsu training, your “partner” takes the form of an aggressor and, unlike aikido, resistance to a technique is allowed. Also, unlike aikido, attacks and holds in aikijujutsu are made with power and focus.

According to legend, the foundations of aikijujutsu were laid down by Prince Teijun in the ninth century. The art was passed down as a bujutsu (military science) for many generations. Around 1180, a physician’s studies led to great contributions to the art. It was his habit to dissect the bodies of war victims and executed criminals to study the effects of various martial arts techniques. This led to the technical sophistication of aikijujutsu, particularly in the area of joint-locking and twisting techniques.

Aikijujutsu continued to be passed down from generation to generation as a “secret and mysterious martial art.” Changes and modifications were of course made with each generation. The objective was to have an effective combat art.

With this new knowledge and better understanding of aikido and aikijujutsu, Lau decided it was time to revive aikijujutsu. He traveled to San Diego and attended seminars taught by daito-ryu instructors from Hokkaido, Japan. Lau later received private instruction in yamate-ryu aikijujutsu, in which he now holds a black-belt ranking.

Lau eventually built a traditional dojo and formed an organization dedicated to the study, training and further development of aikijujutsu for combat and defense tactics suitable for self-defense and law-enforcement work. It is a private organization whose members consist of law-enforcement officers, military personnel and selected individuals. The organization has been in existence for 10 years, and training and research continue to this day.

“It is not a question of which is better, aikijujutsu or aikido,” Lau said. “They both have their merits. It is more a question of which system will better serve the needs of the individual: self-protection or self-perfection. The theory of no enemy is fine, but try explaining that to the lumberjack who’s trying to relocate your nose.”

There are times to be nice, but there are also times when you must turn into an animal. Violence is evil, but sometimes it is your only recourse.

About the author: Gail E. Nelson is a freelance writer based in Seattle.

Canuk

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 766
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2010, 11:21:49 AM »

Interesting read from the historical perspective, also from a practical perspective an important point was raised, It is something that I have tried to instill in my students for years, especially from a LEO stand point and especially to the younger more “gung ho” students.

That point is this. “A person fighting to get a way is a different animal than a person that’s fighting you because they want to fight” Both are dangerous
Logged

JimH

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 2518
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2010, 05:43:36 PM »

I agree with Mr Lau and his findings in regard to Aikido and Aikijujitsu.

When Ueshiba first taught,he taught the Painful aikijujitsu materials,some of his early black Belts still teach the harder style.

Then over time he became more in tune with the spirits and found enlightment and started on a path of less pain,more acceptance / Compliance in training,he changed prior to WWII and made more changes after the War.

This is also the same basic route ,without the same level of enlightment,that Kano took in changing the hard ,painful training of Jujitsu for his creation of Judo.
I read that Kano saw Ueshiba's later style and he said the compliance and structure was what he wanted Judo to be,and that what he saw in Ueshiba's art was Judo.

Both men,Ueshiba and Kano spent years training in and learning the hard ,useable style of aikijujitsu,then changed it a compliant art / sport.

Aikido techniques are the same techniques of Aikijujitsu,just without a resistant opponent,without the atemi /strikes /kicks ,at a wider distance ,and with more self throwing on the part of the Uke so pain is not felt or inflicted.
Take the same techniques,start to train them more aggressively,give and take pain and you end up with Seagal's Tenshin version of Ueshiba's art of Aikido.
Logged

sarguy

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 351
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2010, 03:35:22 AM »

I remember reading this when it came out in February. I liked the article. I recall sitting in a greceful, flowing, Aikikai Aikido class many years ago, wishing for something a bit more "hard", a la AikiJutsu. To the two Sensei's credit, one of them did show where the atemi would go during a technique, but only in slow motion, and never with any amount of resistance or force.
Logged

whitewolf

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 5306
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2010, 06:14:45 AM »

JimH-so i assume (without looking at Sgals version) that he entered strikes,hiting throat,elbows etc and throws/sweeps into the equation but kept the basic movements??
Also i would say you agree with his particluar style?
Keep up the good info for us-u r  like a martial arts book of knowlege-
WW
Logged

Kentbob

  • JOAT
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 2401
  • Sound the horn and call the cry
    • Antrim Self-Protection
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2010, 06:29:15 AM »

THanks Jim, good info.  Some good lessons to be learned from officer Lau.


Kent
Logged
"Specialization is for insects."-Robert A. Heinlein

http://antrimmasp.blogspot.com/

JimH

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 2518
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2010, 08:47:28 AM »

Yes,I like Seagal's version of aikido as he made it applicable to the street by returning to the teachings of Ueshiba as found before the War,before enlightenment,and before Ueshiba was older.
Striking,kicking,power and commitment in training produce usable results.


"O-Sensei always said "Aikido wa budo de aru". And what I felt he really meant was, "This is a martial art and if it doesn't work, take up aerobics, take up dance, or take up a gun! But don't call it the Martial Arts. Aikido is a Martial Art."

Steven Seagal, 7th dan, Shihan
Logged

Bryant

  • Kung Fu Genius
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 293
  • To win in an instant is a superior achievement
    • moy yat ving tsun kung fu
Re: Aikido "versus" Aiki-Jitsu (or Aiki-jujitsu)
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2010, 05:14:27 PM »

There is a great book called "Budo" that compares photographs of O-Sensei's Aikido in his 40s to what he was doing in his 70s. When he was younger every technique started with atemi, as he got older he used more blending, leading, and flowing. After a lifetime of practice I imagine he could go hard or soft and still make it work. Few if any can step on the mat and do what Ueshiba could do in his later years. The problem is that is what everyone is trying to do...
Logged
Proverbs 27:17 - Proverbs 24:3-4