Sarguy,
Sorry for the delay in my response regarding FB groups. Once again, this is just my opinion and personal experience. Your experience and thoughts on the subject are just as valid as my own.
Firstly, let me proudly proclaim my utter disgust for FB in just about every way. It encourages the destruction of communication and uncontrolled, sickening amounts of narcissism. In fact, I once created a "I Hate Facebook" Facebook group. It went pretty well, there for a while, until all of the members stopped talking about nothing but themselves...but, I digress!
We had a school FB group for about a year and a half. After that period, I evaluated it and found it severely lacking. The big problems were two-fold. The first was that as public as it is, FB is not
really public. And, if nobody from the "outside" can read it...well, that pretty much defeats the marketing/advertising goals, pure and simple. I'm sure that there are folks out there that have found the reverse to be true, but for us it was a dud.
Which brings me to my second critique. Because of the type of adult member population that we have historically drawn and currently retain, they don't have much of an interest in participating - adding pictures, writing on the wall, discussions, etc. They mainly fall into two categories - no interest in FB whatsoever because they aren't that techie-oriented, or they are so techie that by the time they have a free moment, they are techied-out!
Anyway, I ended up doing all of the work. One thing that I think is certain death in terms of marketing and advertising these days is having a web presence (of any kind) that is static and never updated. I can go into depth on my thoughts on that subject if anybody is interested, but I doubt they are. I'll just say that no fresh content equals a lame duck. At least, to me it is.
So I killed the FB page. I still have a personal presence on FB, but only for the purpose of having yet another way of finding me online. Instead,
we now have a blog, which suits our purposes much more. It's completely public and the flexibility of design and content is so far superior to FB...
As an aside, our Tai Chi instructor created an FB group and it's a lame duck, too. It's never updated and there is really no content there. What's interesting to an outsider and how can that have a positive reflection on business?
To examine the flip side of the coin, check out fellow SFC member Rob Kloss' activities on FB (I hope he doesn't mind). To my knowledge, to date they have an overall FB group, an FB group specifically for their flagship school and one for their Hapkido group. There is most likely a specific reason for having three groups, most likely an admin issue. But I'll leave that question for Rob to answer, if he is interested.
I find this interesting because it seems to me that there may be a bit of a shotgun effect going on. They will end up with the same content on multiple groups. One group will be stronger than the others. There will be a disconnect happening that will weaken the marketing and advertising impact. Lots of little bits of buckshot, but no powerful bullet...we've got
how many seconds to capture a potential customer's interest?
My bottom line opinion is that a blog is a more worthwhile tool for an MABO. Yes, have some sort of presence on FB (Hoooooooock!), but don't put much into it. Make it a sort of Yellowpages ad. The only reason I can see for it to be a good thing is if you have a HUGE adult population that really, really wants to talk to each other online. Which is just plain odd, I think. Wouldn't a forum be better for that anyway?
Blog = Good (as long as you update it all the time!)
FB Group = Bad (can't end pretty)
Kelly Knight